|
Post by Mr.Scott on May 20, 2020 17:04:44 GMT -5
Should be. Does it have SSE?
|
|
|
Post by antinomy on May 20, 2020 18:38:57 GMT -5
Should be. Does it have SSE? Didn't power it up yet.
|
|
|
Post by george on May 25, 2020 9:16:31 GMT -5
huh?
Still have a couple of Duron Morgans in my drawer 
|
|
|
Post by antinomy on May 25, 2020 22:23:46 GMT -5
Nope  Take a better look - it's not Morgan, it's Palomino core. The most confusing part is that they both are marked as DHD1300AMT1B but steppings are different for Morgan and Palomino.
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on May 26, 2020 17:10:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by antinomy on May 26, 2020 21:12:19 GMT -5
Yeah, but you do understand the difference, don't you? Between a Duron Morgan and a Duron Palomino  What I want to say is that this page of history is not written anywhere yet.
The fun part is that it's mentioned by AMD itself but looks like nobody payed attention.
|
|
|
Post by george on May 27, 2020 2:20:21 GMT -5
Anything "Palomino" core should make 133MHz fsb at stock Vcore. And likely have palomino sized L2 cache. IMO 
|
|
|
Post by alpi on Jun 3, 2020 8:23:49 GMT -5
Look what I have ! 
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Jun 3, 2020 18:05:43 GMT -5
Nice! The 0429 production date should be a ripper.
|
|
|
Post by alpi on Jun 5, 2020 2:59:26 GMT -5
Nice! The 0429 production date should be a ripper. Tested them now. 0429 is nothing more than a bit better Barton but pretty much average. At that point I was a bit sad, because I thought too that late production date could be good. My sadness didn't last long though. Other one is a beast !  Now I trested it with cold water even. That is what I've searching for in the last few years !! 
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Jun 16, 2020 18:13:03 GMT -5
Lookie what I just got. Fairly rare OPN XP-M 2400+. LV 1.35v Note the production date. Hope it goes like the wind. 
|
|
|
Post by mrpaco on Jun 17, 2020 3:46:34 GMT -5
Lookie what I just got. Fairly rare OPN XP-M 2400+. LV 1.35v Note the production date. Hope it goes like the wind. Just dont kill it its first time out on the torture table 
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Jun 17, 2020 6:06:23 GMT -5
If there are more of them available, I'll take two thank you..... Great score!
|
|
|
Post by Macsbeach98 on Jun 17, 2020 6:15:46 GMT -5
I want three love the Date think thats the latest I have seen. 
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Jun 17, 2020 15:21:33 GMT -5
I will see if there are any left. I paid 15 bucks shipped. EDIT- He had 6. All are gone.  I shoulda bought em all.
|
|
|
Post by alpi on Jun 19, 2020 16:48:42 GMT -5
Wow ! Late 2007 ! Curious how it goes !
|
|
|
Post by antinomy on Jun 20, 2020 23:18:27 GMT -5
 Worth a try?
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Jun 21, 2020 2:36:53 GMT -5
It's a "K" chip/stepping, I woudn't expect alot from it.... But then again you never really know either. For reference, "K" chips were known to be the worst of the bunch from a wafer. You probrably knew that already but had to say it anyway.
|
|
|
Socket 462
Feb 22, 2021 19:37:46 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by obscureparadox on Feb 22, 2021 19:37:46 GMT -5
Sorry for the necro bump boys, but got a bit of a weird one and hoping someone may be able to shed some light for me. I've been having a play around with my Geode Nx chips and I'm getting issues where 4/5 of my chips do not want to boot at any multiplier higher than 10. The other goes as high as 19 with no issues whatsoever. My question is really, do you think this is down to the lack of microcodes in the Bios for this CPU causing issues, or is this just regular expected behaviour for these chips? I'm thinking personally it's not a CPU thing or at least hoping it isn't. If any of you happen to have the microcodes for these chips could you drop me a link for them as i can't seem to find them anyway, much abliged chaps
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Feb 22, 2021 21:32:39 GMT -5
Sorry for the necro bump boys, but got a bit of a weird one and hoping someone may be able to shed some light for me. I've been having a play around with my Geode Nx chips and I'm getting issues where 4/5 of my chips do not want to boot at any multiplier higher than 10. The other goes as high as 19 with no issues whatsoever. My question is really, do you think this is down to the lack of microcodes in the Bios for this CPU causing issues, or is this just regular expected behaviour for these chips? I'm thinking personally it's not a CPU thing or at least hoping it isn't. If any of you happen to have the microcodes for these chips could you drop me a link for them as i can't seem to find them anyway, much abliged chaps May not directly answer your question about the microcode, but I believe you can pin mod for higher multipliers. However I'm not entirely sure, OCInside only lists XP Tbred. And Barton core.
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Feb 23, 2021 5:45:03 GMT -5
Pin mods for changing the multiplier will only work for non-superlocked chips and Geodes are well past the 0339 superlock date. This does sound like a CPU related issue (To me) because one does it, the other 4 don't. The man that would know if any here do will be along shortly. BTW good to see you.
|
|
|
Socket 462
Feb 23, 2021 16:05:38 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by obscureparadox on Feb 23, 2021 16:05:38 GMT -5
Yeah I was kinda worried it might be cpu related, but i realised when leaving for work today that I have a Lanparty board in the attic too so I really should try with that tonight to confirm, the NF7 had been on LN2 a couple of days earlier so it may have been unhappy after that, who knows. Truthfully it's probably well overdue a Bios reflash also. But good to be here honestly. It's been a while since I've plugged an old school board back in so I'm glad to be getting back to benching 462
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Feb 23, 2021 17:34:41 GMT -5
It's not a micro code thing. Geodes use the same code as XP-M's. They work just like them. You have a chip issue. NF7 is plug and play for them. You can try a bios flash and see if it makes any difference, but I honestly don't think it will. Keep us posted. I'll help you out with anything I can. Good to hear from you Lewis, it's been a while. 
|
|
|
Post by antinomy on Feb 23, 2021 19:51:37 GMT -5
and Geodes are well past the 0339 superlock date. Are you sure on that? I've thought only desktop Bartons were superlocked. Mobiles weren't and I thought Geode was like mobile. And it's Thoroughbred.
|
|
|
Socket 462
Feb 23, 2021 20:03:27 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by obscureparadox on Feb 23, 2021 20:03:27 GMT -5
They're definitely not superlocked no since I can still play with the multi it just hard walls pretty early :/ I'll test on the DFI board shortly as I've just got in from work and let you know.
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Feb 23, 2021 20:26:41 GMT -5
I think my favorite multiplier is 9x. ~\"/~ *shrugs*
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Feb 23, 2021 20:39:42 GMT -5
I think my favorite multiplier is 9x. ~\"/~ *shrugs* 11.5x 
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Feb 23, 2021 20:41:54 GMT -5
I think my favorite multiplier is 9x. ~\"/~ *shrugs* 11.5x  Yes sir, that one works well with 800mhz chips. 1.6ghz chips too. But 10x isn't a "bad" multi to work with I don't think? Want that high bus clocks I gather?
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Feb 23, 2021 20:51:29 GMT -5
There are plenty of bios's out there with the 'terrible 10's'. I usually stay away. 11.5x works decent with my BH-5 sets. Keeps me in the 250-260 range. Need to bench over 2800 for me to consider it a decent chip.
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Feb 24, 2021 2:40:33 GMT -5
They're definitely not superlocked no since I can still play with the multi it just hard walls pretty early :/ I'll test on the DFI board shortly as I've just got in from work and let you know. Brain-fart on my part. The Geodes are unlocked the same as a XP-M, I was thinking something that was actually something else. I'm just getting old and senile guys.
|
|