|
Post by Macsbeach98 on Apr 5, 2020 0:56:04 GMT -5
Here are my 754 placeholders sorry Scotty using that 3000+ Venice I got for the teams cup. Now I will sit back and watch you fella's Macsbeach98 / 3000+ Venice / NF4X / CPUz = 3231.61 Mhz / valid.x86.fr/x83au5Macsbeach98 / 3000+ Venice / NF4X / Cine = 445 CB Macsbeach98 / 3000+ Venice / NF4X / Pifast = 40.91
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Apr 5, 2020 7:59:51 GMT -5
Don't blame you. It's an exceptional Venice chip.
|
|
|
Post by alpi on Apr 6, 2020 12:46:31 GMT -5
Placeholders for 939 Alpi : Athlon 3700+ : 7900 GTO : 3D03 = 24170 Alpi : Athlon 3700+ : 7900 GTO : 3D05 = 11785 Alpi : Athlon 3700+ : 7900 GTO : Wprime = 1778.077
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Apr 6, 2020 16:38:36 GMT -5
Placeholders for 939 Alpi : Athlon 3700+ : 7900 GTO : 3D03 = 24170 Alpi : Athlon 3700+ : 7900 GTO : 3D05 = 11785 Alpi : Athlon 3700+ : 7900 GTO : Wprime = 1778.077 Oh you have a 7900 as well?!? I'm in trouble. Nice scores Alpi, you always impress me!
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Apr 6, 2020 18:27:11 GMT -5
You are correct Shrimpy - Impressive as always.
|
|
|
Post by alpi on Apr 7, 2020 1:28:34 GMT -5
Ohh c'mon guys, I'm sure not me will be the real attraction here just need some time to see more subs but Your words felt really good to me ! Worth a lot from respected fellows always. To tell the truth I used my 7900 because seen Pete used this so I thought it shouldn't be far from good one. These older vgas on an old platform is always a big magic for me. Not really can predict the real performance usually.
|
|
ivan
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by ivan on Apr 7, 2020 15:04:11 GMT -5
Socket A placeholder for me. I'm trying to get 260MHz stable in the last 2 days, but still no luck. 250MHz is easy, 255-256 is where it stops for me. Individual sticks run at 265MHz, but 260 is not stable in DC. A little slow for the speed and no wazza yet. It definitely could be improved by several seconds. Will get the cpuz version sorted next time. Ivan: XP-M 2500+ / NF7-S v2.0 / Pi 32M / 29m 39.789s
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Apr 7, 2020 15:32:06 GMT -5
250MHz is easy, 255-256 is where it stops for me. Individual sticks run at 265MHz, but 260 is not stable in DC. I got the same thing going on my NF7. Always been that way. Had no issue going to 273 on the Ultra B.
|
|
ivan
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by ivan on Apr 7, 2020 16:50:01 GMT -5
It can run 270 1M, but no 32M at 260. Might be able to get a couple more MHz out of it, but currently 260 seems to be impossible and I tried several boards (all Abit, though). Will have to get the DFI Ultra-B out and see if it makes any difference. I'm not happy with the score, but it still happens to classify for the #5 K7 32M on the bot. Wazza should get me to #4.
I will start testing other CPUs that I haven't submitted on the bot yet, enough with that XP-M 2500+. 12x at these FSB speeds is too much and with 11.5x I am FSB-limited for 32M.
|
|
|
Post by alpi on Apr 7, 2020 16:52:48 GMT -5
Socket A placeholder for me. I'm trying to get 260MHz stable in the last 2 days, but still no luck. 250MHz is easy, 255-256 is where it stops for me. Individual sticks run at 265MHz, but 260 is not stable in DC. A little slow for the speed and no wazza yet. It definitely could be improved by several seconds. Will get the cpuz version sorted next time. Ivan: XP-M 2500+ / NF7-S v2.0 / Pi 32M / 29m 39.789s Wow, that's nice ! Very strong set ! For a placeholder even more ! Nice work, grats !
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Apr 7, 2020 18:53:31 GMT -5
It can run 270 1M, but no 32M at 260. Might be able to get a couple more MHz out of it, but currently 260 seems to be impossible and I tried several boards (all Abit, though). Will have to get the DFI Ultra-B out and see if it makes any difference. I'm not happy with the score, but it still happens to classify for the #5 K7 32M on the bot. Wazza should get me to #4. I will start testing other CPUs that I haven't submitted on the bot yet, enough with that XP-M 2500+. 12x at these FSB speeds is too much and with 11.5x I am FSB-limited for 32M. You did that 3.7ghz on an Athlon XP_M? (your avatar!) I've seen this at the bot, but never wanted to bother you for a cpu-z so I can drool in all it's glory!
|
|
|
Post by alpi on Apr 7, 2020 19:13:07 GMT -5
It can run 270 1M, but no 32M at 260. Might be able to get a couple more MHz out of it, but currently 260 seems to be impossible and I tried several boards (all Abit, though). Will have to get the DFI Ultra-B out and see if it makes any difference. I'm not happy with the score, but it still happens to classify for the #5 K7 32M on the bot. Wazza should get me to #4. I will start testing other CPUs that I haven't submitted on the bot yet, enough with that XP-M 2500+. 12x at these FSB speeds is too much and with 11.5x I am FSB-limited for 32M. You did that 3.7ghz on an Athlon XP_M? (your avatar!) I've seen this at the bot, but never wanted to bother you for a cpu-z so I can drool in all it's glory! hwbot.org/submission/2522747_i.nfrar.ed_cpu_frequency_athlon_xp_m_2500_(barton)_3713.69_mhzBought just a same ram cooler but not helped anything on my cpu clocks so the trick could be elsewhere ! :DDD Yaaayy, I'm pretty much tired now.
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Apr 7, 2020 20:44:23 GMT -5
Just busting his chops a little bit. Only cause I'll likely never see this frequency anywhere else except every day when I log in here. It's a good reminder of why I like overclocking so much. Amazing things can be achieved!! I'm tired too. I should get my sub pictures up I suppose to hold a place.
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Apr 9, 2020 0:25:59 GMT -5
OK Rodney, you can put me in socket 939.
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Apr 10, 2020 6:01:39 GMT -5
OK Rodney, you can put me in socket 939. Before I do: Your score in 3DMark 03 (From what I can tell) looks to be a bugged result.
The subscore in "Nature" is higher than it is in "Troll lair", if I'm not mistaken it's supposed to be lower, not higher.
I checked Mac's for reference and his shows this subscore in nature being the lowest, Alpi's also has this with it.
Don't sweat it - I too have been getting this with my runs and can't really explain why it's happening but it is.
Even with the system and all else at stock I'm getting it.
Either it's bugged or maybe the way it is with certain cards/driver versions - I dunno (Yet).
BTW my card is an X1950GT.
|
|
|
Post by Macsbeach98 on Apr 10, 2020 8:43:32 GMT -5
That score would be Ok Rodney the radeon just does better at Nature than Trolls you see that with certain cards if it was a couple of thousand marks out of line it would definitely be bugged.
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Apr 10, 2020 8:47:24 GMT -5
I would never submit a bugged run intentionally. It seemed accurate after several passes. But that score is just a place holder Rodney. I hope to improve it. @pete, thanks for clarification.
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Apr 10, 2020 9:21:30 GMT -5
Yes, thanks for clearing that up Mac. I'll get you in ASAP Shrimpy.
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Apr 10, 2020 9:33:53 GMT -5
Yes, thanks for clearing that up Mac. I'll get you in ASAP Shrimpy. No worries Bones. Ill double check on the deal later and see if the score changes with different clock speeds maybe drivers. Im using the 7.11 ati driver and not the omega driver by the way. I dont know if there would be any difference.
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Apr 10, 2020 17:44:57 GMT -5
Reserved: Bones: Opty 148 / Ultra D / 7950GT / 1024M WPrime = 1717.312 sec
Opty 148 / Ultra D / 7950GT / 3D Mark 03 = 20115
Opty 148 / Ultra D / 7950GT / 3D Mark 05 = 9142
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Apr 10, 2020 17:49:52 GMT -5
Gonna do some 939 myself this weekend. Opty 154. Here I come Alpi.
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Apr 10, 2020 17:59:47 GMT -5
Bring it!
I'm still working on the rest. Already have a system pic, just haven't grabbed it off the camera yet to post up.
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Apr 10, 2020 19:47:46 GMT -5
Placeholders for 939 Opty 154 / DFI Ultra D / 7900 GTO / Wprime 1024 = 1527.594 Opty 154 / DFI Ultra D / 7900 GTO / 3D05 = 12014 Opty 154 / DFI Ultra D / 7900 GTO / 3D03 = 24742 All air testing. Chiller tomorrow. I'll keep those for later.
|
|
|
Post by Aleslammer on Apr 10, 2020 20:28:38 GMT -5
Reserved Opty 154 / DFI Ultra D / 7900 GTO / Wprime 1024 = 1527.594 All air testing. Chiller tomorrow. Nice!!!! Hope my learning curve isn't long but I'm going to be trying!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Apr 11, 2020 8:14:15 GMT -5
Reserved Opty 154 / DFI Ultra D / 7900 GTO / Wprime 1024 = 1527.594 All air testing. Chiller tomorrow. Nice!!!! Hope my learning curve isn't long but I'm going to be trying!!!! You'll be fine. 939 is just glorified socket A. If you need help, you know where I am. GL
|
|
|
Post by Aleslammer on Apr 13, 2020 21:52:28 GMT -5
Expert wouldn't post this morning switched everything to the Asus it wouldn't post ended up being the VGA which wasn't the first thing I checked. Aleslammer : 146 Opteron : A8N32-SLI Deluxe : ATI 1950XT : 3D03 = 19731 Aleslammer : 146 Opteron : A8N32-SLI Deluxe : ATI 1950XT : 3D05 = 12292 Aleslammer : 146 Opteron : A8N32-SLI Deluxe : ATI 1950XT : WP1024 = 1475.187 Dead VGA two so what I've sub'd is all I got for 3D. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Apr 13, 2020 23:13:57 GMT -5
Will be watching for it.
EDIT: Got it and it's in.
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Scott on Apr 14, 2020 20:20:57 GMT -5
Very good WP score Brad.
|
|
|
Post by Bones on Apr 16, 2020 10:35:14 GMT -5
Socket 754 Bones: ML-42 Turion / NF4X / CPU-Z / = 3024.43 Bones: ML-42 Turion / NF4X / Cinebench 2003 / = 425 Bones ML-42 Turion / NF4X / PI Fast / = 42.64
|
|
|
Post by ShrimpBrime on Apr 16, 2020 16:35:36 GMT -5
OK here's my updated s939 scores Rodney. I cannot fit the pictures into my "reserved" thread because of the 4 picture limit. My Apologies for that, was hoping to try and help keep it organized. ShrimpBrime / Opteron 148 / UT Expert / 7900GS 256mb 3DMark03 22481pts ShrimpBrime / Opteron 148 / UT Expert / 7900GS 256mb 3DMark05 10927pts And this is the alpi inspired video. Not as nice, but displays the hardware in use for the above runs. (was taped before the modification) Enjoy
|
|